Additional General Allocation Fund (DAU) Policy: The Failure of the Local Government to Provide an Urban Village Budget Allocation in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62157/ijsdfs.v1i1.4Keywords:
Urban village fund, Local government, Decentralization, General Allocation Fund, Policy implementationAbstract
Initially, an additional DAU policy was issued in 2018, namely through Law Number 12 of 2018, concerning the State Revenue and Expenditure Budget for the 2019 Fiscal Year. This policy was designed to provide additional funds to urban villages. District budget allocations are the responsibility of local governments (PEMDA) according to the mandate of Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Local Government. This study analyzes the failure of the local government to allocate Urban village funds through the General Allocation Fund (DAU) policy. DAU is a fund earmarked for equal distribution of abilities in inter-regional finance to fund regional needs in implementing decentralized government. The additional DAU policy is essential to anticipate due to the local government's failures in allocating these funds. This study aims to analyze the central government's Urban Village Fund policy through the State Revenue and Expenditure Budget (APBN). It reflects the failure of the local government to allocate a budget to urban villages from the State Revenue and Expenditure Budget (APBN). Besides that, it reflects local governments' inability to allocate budgets to urban villages.
References
Ahmed, S. A., Hegazy, N. N., Kumar, A. P., Abouzeid, E., Wasfy, N. F., Atta, K., ... & Hamdy, H. (2022). A guide to best practice in faculty development for health professions schools: a qualitative analysis. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 1-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Brynard, P. (2005). Policy implementation: Lessons for service delivery. Journal of public administration, 40(si-3), 649-664. [Google Scholar]
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2004). Principles of qualitative research: Designing a qualitative study. Office of Qualitative & Mixed Methods Research, University of Nebraska, Lincoln. [Google Scholar]
Fleurke, F., & Willemse, R. (2004). Approaches to decentralization and local autonomy: A critical appraisal. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 26(4), 523-544. [Google Scholar]
Grindle, M. S., & Thomas, J. W. (1989). Policy makers, policy choices, and policy outcomes: The political economy of reform in developing countries. Policy sciences, 22(3-4), 213-248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Gunena, N. (2013). Peran Lurah Dalam Pembangunan Infrastruktur Di Kelurahan Kolongan Mitung Kecamatan Tahuna Barat Kabupaten Sangihe. Governance, 5(1), 90-100. [Google Scholar]
Madubun, J. (2023). Public services in island sub‐districts: Towards geography‐based governance. Australian Journal of Public Administration 00, 1–21. [CrossRef]
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc. [Google Scholar]
Sellers, J. M., Lidström, A., & Bae, Y. (2020). Multilevel democracy: How local institutions and civil society shape the modern state. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
Swianiewicz, P. (2004). Cities in transition: From statism to democracy. In Urban Governance and Democracy (pp. 112-138). Routledge. [Google Scholar]
Saputra, A. R., Iqma, A. G., Karimah, I., & Najihah, R. (2022). Pembentukan Struktur Kelembagaan Sebagai Model Perencanaan Sosial Dalam Mewujudkan Kebangkitan Kampoeng Batik Karanglo Indah Saat Pandemi. RESIPROKAL: Jurnal Riset Sosiologi Progresif Aktual, 4(1), 14-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pierre, J. (2014). Can urban regimes travel in time and space? Urban regime theory, urban governance theory, and comparative urban politics. Urban Affairs Review, 50(6), 864-889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.