Government Responsiveness through Gub Report Innovation in Central Java Province, Indonesia
https://doi.org/10.62157/ijsdfs.v1i1.2
Keywords:
Innovation, Public services, Government responsiveness, Gub report, Indonesia contextAbstract
Innovation in public services is a must in responding to challenges in today's digital era. Public services previously slow, transparent, and full of KKN can be trimmed with innovation. The public can monitor the government and provide criticism or input. Government officials are required to be able to work with this technological development or what we know as e-government. E-government is a digitization process initially carried out manually, simplifying bureaucracy and providing various services to the community. This study aims to determine the function of the government's response to various community complaints through the Gub Report channel in Central Java Province. The method used in this study is a qualitative-descriptive method using secondary data related to the substance of the study, such as documents, previous research journals, and related regulations. This study found that for 2022, from January to October, the number of complaints recorded was 18,543, and a total of 9,758 complaints were processed. Public sector organizations must experience classic constraints: limited capacity and unequal human resources. To realize a responsive government, Central Java Province needs to receive complaints from the community through direct and open government services. The selection process of the echelon apparatus is more selective and competitive in preparing its change program through public service innovation, educating the public about the process of using the Gub report website channel, and educating the public about the procedures for using the Gub report website channel.
References
Alrehaili, N., Almutairi, Y., Alasmari, M., Assiry, A., & Meccawy, D. M. (2017). A unified E-Government service: an essential component of a Smart City. International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology, 4 (7), 1–4.
Al-Shbail, T. & Aman, A. (2018). E-government and accountability: How to mitigate the disorders and dysfunctions of accountability relationships. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 12(2), 155-190. [CrossRef]
Arfan, S., Mayarni, M., & Nasution, M. S. (2021). Responsivity of Public Services in Indonesia during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 4(1), 552-562. [CrossRef]
Berlilana, B., Hariguna, T., & Lai, M. T. (2018). Effects of relationship quality on citizen intention use of E-government services: An empirical study of e-government system. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 8(6), 5127-5133. [CrossRef]
Christiansen, J., & Bunt, L. (2012). Innovation in policy: allowing for creativity. Social Complexity and Uncertainty in Public Governance, 38. NESTA report, October 2012. [Google Scholar]
Cordella, A. (2007). E-government: towards the e-bureaucratic form? Journal of information technology, 22, 265-274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2009). Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers. Journal of public administration research and theory, 19(3), 495-522. [Google Scholar]
Deby, L., Princess, M., & Mutiarin, D. (2018. Effectiveness of Public Policy Innovation; Its influence on the Quality of Public Services in Indonesia. Association of Postgraduate Programs of Muhammadiyah University Yogyakarta.
Dwiyanto, A. (2002). Reformasi birokrasi publik di Indonesia. Pusat Studi Kependudukan dan Kebijakan (PSKK), Gajah Mada University Press: Yogyakarta
Farida, I., Setiawan, R., Maryatmi, A. S., & Juwita, M. N. (2020). The implementation of E-government in the industrial revolution era 4.0 in Indonesia. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies, 22(2), 340-346. [Google Scholar]
Hadi, K. (2016). Corruption of Public Service Bureaucracy in the Era of Regional Autonomy. Journal of Political Research, 7(1), 20-28.
Huda, M. (2020). Inovasi Manajemen Pelayanan Publik Melalui Government Resources Management System (GRMS) di Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Politik Walisongo, 2(2), 67-82. [CrossRef]
Kaul, M. (1997). The new public administration: management innovations in government. Public Administration and Development: The International Journal of Management Research and Practice, 17(1), 13-26. [Google Scholar]
Nalien, E. M., & Ilham, T. (2019). The Effect of Bureaucratic Reforms Implementation for Optimizing of Governance in Indonesia (Focus on the Public Service Innovation in Local Government Institutions). International Journal of Kybernology, 3(2), 43-59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nurharyoko, G. O., Pramudita, A., & Nugroho, R. B. B. (Eds.). (2020). Inovasi birokrasi: membuat kerja birokrat lebih bermakna. Gramedia: Jakarta.
Prasetya, A. G. (2017). Mengintegrasikan Reformasi Birokrasi dengan Inovasi Sektor Publik. Jurnal Analis Kebijakan, 1(1), 49-62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Raharjo, M. M. I. (2022). Manajemen Pelayanan Publik. PT. Bumi Aksara: Jakarta.
Rahayu, A. Y. S. (2020). Pelayanan publik dan e-government: sebuah teori dan konsep. PT Rajagrafindo Persada: Depok.
Rahman, F. & Tarigan. J. (2020). Government Innovation: Towards Ideal Regional Governance. Cita Intrans Selaras: Malang, East Java.
Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
Sartika, D. (2019). Urgency of State Administration Innovation System (SINAGARA) on Regional Government Performance. Policy & Governance Review, 3(3), 244-257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sedarmayanti, H., & Dr, MP (2004). Good Governance. CV. Mandar Forward. Bandung.
Serrano Cárdenas, L. F., Vásquez González, Y. L., Díaz-Piraquive, F. N., & Guillot Landecker, J. E. (2019). Public innovation: Concept and future research agenda. In Knowledge Management in Organizations: 14th International Conference, KMO 2019, Zamora, Spain, July 15–18, 2019, Proceedings 14 (pp. 165-177). Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar]
Setiawan, B. & Nainggolan, B. (2019). Ganjar Pranowo: Bridge of Change. PT Kompas Media Nusantara: Jakarta.
Sofianto, A. (2019). Inovasi Manajemen Pemerintahan Berbasis Aplikasi Digital di Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Matra Pembaruan: Jurnal Inovasi Kebijakan, 3(2), 99–108. [CrossRef]
Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government–A literature review. Government information quarterly, 36(2), 167-178. [CrossRef]
Uddin, M. G., & Uddin, M. (2020). E-Government Development & Digital Economy: Relationship. American Economic & Social Review, 6(1), 39-54. [Google Scholar]
Winarno, B. (2016). Kebijakan publik era globalisasi. Media Pressindo. [Google Scholar]
Windrum, P. (2008). Innovation and entrepreneurship in public services. Innovation in public sector services: Entrepreneurship, creativity and management, pp. 3-20. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar. [Google Scholar]
Wirman, S. (2012). Studi Tentang Administrasi Publik. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Yusnadi, Y. (2020). Responsive Governance Pemerintah Daerah melalui Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) di Kecamatan Muara Bengkal Kabupaten Kutai Timur. JAP: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 3(1), 126-144. [Google Scholar]
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
