An Integrated Critical Path Method and PERT Approach for Schedule Performance Evaluation of Drainage Construction Projects
https://doi.org/10.62157/ijietom.v3i2.114
Keywords:
Critical Path Method, Program Evaluation and Review Technique, Schedule Performance, Drainage Construction Project, Project ManagementAbstract
Time control is a critical factor in the successful delivery of drainage construction projects, which are often characterized by high complexity, limited working space, and significant uncertainty in activity durations. Delays in such projects can have substantial economic and social impacts, underscoring the need for reliable schedule performance evaluation. This study aims to evaluate the schedule performance of a drainage construction project by integrating the Critical Path Method (CPM) and the Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) using a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)-based approach. The research employs secondary data in the form of a project schedule presented as a weekly S-curve with a planned duration of 180 calendar days. A CPM network is developed at the WBS level to identify the dominant project path, followed by applying PERT to critical activities to assess duration uncertainty and completion probability. The results indicate that the dominant path consists of preparation works, earthworks and piling works, drainage channel construction, and pedestrian access works, with drainage channel construction identified as the most critical activity. The PERT analysis reveals that uncertainty in dominant activities increases the expected project duration and reduces the likelihood of on-time completion. These findings suggest that deterministic scheduling alone may underestimate project timelines, whereas integrating CPM and PERT provides a more realistic evaluation framework. The study concludes that a WBS-based CPM–PERT approach is effective for assessing schedule performance under data limitations and offers practical insights for improving project time control and decision-making.
References
Agyei, W. (2015). Project planning and scheduling using PERT and CPM techniques with linear programming: A case study. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 4(8), 222–227.
Andiyan, A., Putra, R. M., Rembulan, G. D., & Tannady, H. (2021). Construction project evaluation using CPM-crashing, CPM-PERT and CCPM for minimizing project delays. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1933(1), 012096. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1933/1/012096
Aulia, S., & Cipta, H. (2023). Network planning analysis using CPM and PERT methods on optimization of time and cost. Sinkron: Jurnal dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 8(1), 171–177.
Ba’Its, H. A., Puspita, I. A., & Bay, A. F. (2020). Combination of program evaluation and review technique (PERT) and critical path method (CPM) for project schedule development. International Journal of Integrated Engineering, 12(3), 68–75.
Bagshaw, K. B. (2021). PERT and CPM in project management with practical examples. American Journal of Operations Research, 11(4), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajor.2021.114013
Calp, M. H., & Akcayol, M. A. (2018). Optimization of project scheduling activities in dynamic CPM and PERT networks using genetic algorithms. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, 22(2), 615–627.
Derbe, G., Li, Y., Wu, D., & Zhao, Q. (2020). Scientometric review of construction project schedule studies: Trends, gaps, and future directions. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 26(4), 343–363. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2020.12317
Fauzah, D., Setyawan, R., Laksmi, A. A., & Soebakti, S. A. (2024). Optimizing project scheduling using CPM and PERT methods (Case study: Pejambon 8-storey flat, Central Jakarta). Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil, 28(2), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.24843/JITS.2024.v28.i02.p02
Hajdu, M., & Bokor, O. (2014). Sensitivity analysis in PERT networks: Does activity duration distribution matter? Automation in Construction, 40, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.12.003
Hanifa, P., Megawati, L., & Wahidin, W. (2024). Scheduling analysis using CPM and PERT for maintenance projects. INVEST: Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 5(1), 102–107.
Itani, K. I. (2023). Mastering construction schedules: The power of CPM and PERT integration. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 11(10), 868–875.
Kelley, J. E., Jr., & Walker, M. R. (1959). Critical-path planning and scheduling. Operations Research, 7(5), 646–660. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.7.5.646
Malcolm, D. G., Roseboom, J. H., Clark, C. E., & Fazar, W. (1959). Application of a technique for research and development program evaluation. Operations Research, 7(5), 646–669. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.7.5.646
Mansur Nuhu, A., Suleiman, K., & Hassan, N. I. (2024). Utilizing CPM and PERT in project planning and scheduling incorporating linear programming. International Journal of Scientific Research in Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, 11(1), 6–10.
Maravas, A., & Pantouvakis, J. P. (2012). Project cash flow analysis in the presence of uncertainty in activity duration and cost. International Journal of Project Management, 30(3), 374–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.08.005
Ridwan, A. (2025). Optimizing project time management using the critical path method (CPM) and program evaluation and review technique (PERT). Jurnal Aplikasi Pelayaran dan Kepelabuhanan, 15(2), 354–361.
Saputra, R. A. (2025). Planning of implementation schedules using CPM and PERT methods in office construction projects. Journal of Social Research, 4(5), 851–868.
Sukamta, N. R., Sumarauw, J. S., Karuntu, M. M., Wullur, M., Temewu, F. J., & Wangke, S. J. C. (2026). Implementation of project scheduling using CPM and PERT in housing construction projects. Multidisciplinary Indonesian Center Journal, 3(1), 908–922.
Suryono, Y. B., & Hasbullah, H. (2020). Analysis of production line improvement using CPM, DSM, and PERT. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research, 1(4), 9–17.
Trietsch, D., & Baker, K. R. (2012). PERT 21: Fitting PERT/CPM for use in the 21st century. International Journal of Project Management, 30(4), 490–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.09.004
Wang, X., Truijens, M., Hou, L., Wang, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2014). Integrating augmented reality with building information modeling: Onsite construction process controlling for liquefied natural gas industry. Automation in Construction, 40, 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.12.003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




