Cognitive and Neurolinguistic Aspects of Advertising Discourse Perception

https://doi.org/10.62157/ijietom.v2i2.60

Authors

  • Farida Egamberdieva Department of Pedagogy and Psychology, Faculty of Pedagogy, Oriental University, 100066 Almazar District, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
  • Shakhzoda Egamberdieva Department of Pedagogy and Psychology, Faculty of Pedagogy, Oriental University, 100066 Almazar District, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Keywords:

Neurolinguistics, Advertising discourse, Semantic priming, Syntactic processing, Hemispheric lateralization, Cognitive aspect

Abstract

This study examines how cognitive and neurolinguistic mechanisms influence consumer behavior and decision-making in advertising. It explores the roles of attentional salience, memory encoding, and emotional responses in shaping how advertisements affect audiences. Attention is critical, driven by visual stimuli (e.g., colors, motion) and top-down processes based on personal goals and cultural relevance. Memory encoding is supported through repetition, rhyme, and the integration of verbal and visual cues, while emotional triggers engage the amygdala, enhancing retention. Neurolinguistic techniques, such as semantic priming, create subconscious associations between words, images, and brand values, accelerating comprehension and promoting positive perceptions. For example, luxury brands use semantic cues to suggest exclusivity, while metaphors activate sensory and cognitive areas, strengthening engagement. Additionally, advertising content is processed through hemispheric lateralization, with the left hemisphere focusing on linguistic aspects and the right hemisphere processing visuals and emotions. This study underscores the significance of incorporating these cognitive and neurolinguistic principles into advertising. Examples include Coca-Cola’s use of visual icons for universal attention, Nike’s use of memorable slogans for retention, and Dove’s emotional appeals for loyalty. Also, culturally tailored approaches, such as aligning metaphors with societal norms, enhance relevance across diverse audiences. The research suggests using neuroimaging tools, like fMRI and EEG, to identify neural correlates of engagement. It emphasizes the potential of machine learning and neuromarketing in customizing advertisements based on individual neural responses. Integrating these principles can help create emotionally and cognitively impactful campaigns.

References

Bandler, R., & Grinder, J. (1975). The structure of magic: A book about language and therapy. Science and Behavior Books.

Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2

Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial metaphor in advertising. Routledge.

Gazzaniga, M. S. (2000). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind. Norton.

Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. SAGE.

Hubert, M., & Kenning, P. (2008). A current overview of consumer neuroscience. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7(4–5), 272–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.233

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Knutson, B., Rick, S., Wimmer, G. E., Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2007). Neural predictors of purchases. Neuron, 53(1), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.010

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.

Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the ERP. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.

Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 259–289. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085654

Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106(3), 226–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.106.3.226

Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 255–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084295

Shakhzoda, E. (2024). Analysis of the language of advertising discourse based on English-language advertising texts. Vestnik UzMU, 1(1.4), 373–376. https://doi.org/10.69617/uzmu.v1i1.4.2109

Springer, S. P., & Deutsch, G. (1993). Left brain, right brain: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (4th ed.). W.H. Freeman and Company.

Torelli, C. J., & Shavitt, S. (2010). Culture and concepts of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 703–723. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020388

Zaltman, G. (2003). How customers think: Essential insights into the mind of the market. Harvard Business School Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Egamberdieva, F., & Egamberdieva, S. (2024). Cognitive and Neurolinguistic Aspects of Advertising Discourse Perception. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, Technology & Operations Management, 2(2), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.62157/ijietom.v2i2.60